Adequate Procedures, Bribery Act & Proceeds of Crime - Written by on Tuesday, August 2, 2011 23:46 - 1 Comment

A lawyers certificate of Adequate Procedures compliance. How much would you pay?

Print Friendly

This is not an advert!

Richard Alderman, Director of the SFO recently had this to say on the subject lawyers certificates on Adequate Procedures:

“No set of procedures can ever guard against the one off occurrence. We will be realistic about this. We do though expect the Board of the group to take an active interest in these issues and to be able to demonstrate to employees wherever they are that bribery will not be tolerated. These employees are very alert to messages from the top and will pick up what really matters to the Board. If the message from the Board (whether spoken or unspoken) is that it does not matter how business is obtained so long as it is obtained, then it will be no surprise if bribery occurs. If though employees know that the Board only wants ethical business, then they know that that is the tone set from the top. In the SFO we are therefore very interested in the lead set by the top of the organisation.

We know, for example, that some companies believe that all they need is a certificate from a firm of lawyers that they have adequate procedures. We hear about this. We hear as well that the company is not prepared to pay very much for this and expects a certificate of adequate procedures for its worldwide enterprise under say £25,000. This will not impress us very much. This does not mean that we expect companies to spend millions of pounds on this. What we do expect though is a proportionate approach by companies focussing on the key risks and on what they are doing in order to be able to combat those risks. This is what companies should be doing anyway. Indeed some companies have told us that this is a valuable exercise for them for all sorts of reasons that they should have carried out before.

A company that does this but which finds problems will receive very sympathetic treatment at the SFO. A company that closes its mind to the issues while perhaps having some veneer of paper procedures will receive different treatment.” [our emphasis]

Money may talk.  But actions speak louder than words.

Take care.

Share Button

1 Comment

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Compliance Certificates « FCPA Professor
Aug 22, 2011 2:07

[…] week, (see here) had a post regarding an adequate procedures certificate.  The post profiled a recent speech by […]

Brought to you by...

Barry Vitou &
Richard Kovalevsky Q.C.

The views expressed on this website are those of Barry Vitou & Richard Kovalevsky QC and/or our guest authors from time to time. Please see our terms of use

in association with...

Our Tweets

Sunday, February 4, 2018 18:17

BREAKING: Opinion: The old rules still apply & always did. High Court rules litigation privilege applies in interna…

Sunday, February 4, 2018 11:31

Bilta & Ors v RBS & Anor : Privilege Update post ENRC

Sunday, February 4, 2018 11:02

Worth a read for the lawyers among you. You'll be rewarded...

Tuesday, November 21, 2017 6:21

US charges ex-HK official with Africa corruption via @FT

Monday, October 23, 2017 15:11

BE QUICK: 16 November: Tickets going fast…Roll up, Roll up – hear David Green QC’s Swan Song & Hui Chen in London