Your Questions: Answered - Written by on Tuesday, February 7, 2012 14:48 - 1 Comment

I’m appointing an Agent in China. What would Mabey Group do? Your questions answered. By Peter Lloyd CEO Mabey Group

Print Friendly

Dear Peter,

My company has appointed an agent in China to sell our products which has been recommended to us by our potential customers.

The Agent has signed the Agency Agreement which includes wording that says he will comply with the Bribery Act.   I thought this would be enough to protect us but someone told me that I should do more than this but I don’t see how I can since I can’t control the Agent who won’t be an employee.

How does the Mabey Group deal with situations like this?

Peter’s Answer:

We do not currently have an agent in China, but I am happy to explain our general procedure for this type of appointment.

In our view a written confirmation of compliance is essential, but by no means all that needs to be done. China remains a relatively high risk country, reference the TI index, although I believe that some parts of this country are moving very rapidly towards good practice.

I would start by doing extensive due diligence on the agent, using internationally recognised agencies to investigate and certify where possible. Face to face interviews and training would also be essential to ensure that they both understand and are committed to compliance with the Bribery Act.

An experienced interviewer needs to make good use of his or her ‘nose’. If any form of commission payments are involved, then each deal requires a level of due diligence, ensuring that the deal makes ‘sense’ and that the various parties involved have good credentials.

Finally, if there is a commission payment due I would want to see a re-affirmation that no corrupt payments have or will be made and a value for money check to ensure that the agents commission is not excessive, potentially providing the funds for corrupt activity.

I regard these as the basics, with the need to treat each agent, country and deal on its own merits. Remember that in the event of a corrupt payment, then your only defence will be the adequacy of your procedures and the court will have the benefit of 20:20 hindsight.

 

Share Button


1 Comment

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

High Tide: From Ending The Sting Prosecutions To Impounding African Autocrats … | Rishwat – Campaign against Corruption in India
Feb 21, 2012 3:20

[…] Mike Volkov has tips for interviewing witnesses. Peter Lloyd, chief executive of the Mabey Group, answers a question at […]

Brought to you by...

Barry Vitou &
Richard Kovalevsky Q.C.

The views expressed on this website are those of Barry Vitou & Richard Kovalevsky QC and/or our guest authors from time to time. Please see our terms of use

in association with...

Our Tweets

Sunday, June 11, 2017 8:18

Opinion: As debate shifts from future of SFO to future of Theresa May we say: At last, fund the SFO properly. https://t.co/PwuCqHPkTq

Friday, June 9, 2017 12:21

SFO cat uses up another life! SFO set to stay after Theresa May's authority is seriously undermined.

Tuesday, May 23, 2017 11:44

Opinion: Conservatives must answer two basic questions about the plan to merge the SFO into the NCA https://t.co/OREkjacH2H

Thursday, May 18, 2017 21:07

Announcement of SFO merger into the NCA must be followed with detailed plans and assurances to SFO plans now https://t.co/Sbq5zt9yWP

Friday, January 27, 2017 16:13

Why people bribe. What stops them. And what to do if you’re worried you’ve bribed someone. https://t.co/tYdE9rhoOz