Your Questions: Answered - Written by on Sunday, May 20, 2012 3:55 - 2 Comments

Your questions answered: Peter Lloyd, CEO Mabey Group looks at long supply chains

Print Friendly

Dear Peter,

My business is in the construction industry and we often have long supply chains.  The guidance for the Bribery Act says that we should focus on those that we have contracts with.  However, it may be that there are people supplying services to us who are other peoples sub-contractors.

Putting aside the government guidance the Bribery Act says that we are on the hook these subcontractors.    It’s unwieldy to vet the entire supply chain and can be impossible since we may not know who is in it.

In practice how would you deal with this?

Peter’s Answer:

This is not a situation that we have come across to a significant extent as our ‘in-country’ supply chains rarely extend beyond a single level. My immediate view is that we would do a basic risk assessment of the supply chain and look at who might be capable of corrupt actions that could create a risk for Mabey.

For example, if we have a relationship, possibly a partnership, with a main contractor who is tendering to win government contracts, then we would undoubtedly require a rigorous level of due diligence on the main contractor. If after the tender is awarded the contractor chooses a local sub-contractor to do some of the work through an open tender, perhaps erection of the bridge, then the risk that that sub-contractor has been corrupt on behalf of the tender team and Mabey should be small. However, if the sub-contractor is part of the tender team and has a direct interest in winning the government tender, then we would be more concerned and additional due diligence would be required. As always, there is no simple answer, but appropriate risk assessment and due diligence within a solid management system will give you the best protection that you can get.

Share Button


2 Comments

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Coffee Talk Shop… » Blog Archive » High Tide: From South Korea Mulls Iran Embargo To Swiss Probes of Syrians, Libyans
May 21, 2012 13:26

[…] empowers compliance officers and runs through some nightmare scenarios. Thebriberyact.com has a guest take a question about supply chains and notes statistics from the Scottish asset forfeiture […]

High Tide: From South Korea Mulls Iran Embargo To Swiss Probes of Syrians, Libyans | Rishwat – Campaign against Corruption in India
May 21, 2012 16:44

[…] empowers compliance officers and runs through some nightmare scenarios. Thebriberyact.com has a guest take a question about supply chains and notes statistics from the Scottish asset forfeiture […]

Brought to you by...

Barry Vitou &
Richard Kovalevsky Q.C.

The views expressed on this website are those of Barry Vitou & Richard Kovalevsky QC and/or our guest authors from time to time. Please see our terms of use

in association with...

Our Tweets

Sunday, June 11, 2017 8:18

Opinion: As debate shifts from future of SFO to future of Theresa May we say: At last, fund the SFO properly. https://t.co/PwuCqHPkTq

Friday, June 9, 2017 12:21

SFO cat uses up another life! SFO set to stay after Theresa May's authority is seriously undermined.

Tuesday, May 23, 2017 11:44

Opinion: Conservatives must answer two basic questions about the plan to merge the SFO into the NCA https://t.co/OREkjacH2H

Thursday, May 18, 2017 21:07

Announcement of SFO merger into the NCA must be followed with detailed plans and assurances to SFO plans now https://t.co/Sbq5zt9yWP

Friday, January 27, 2017 16:13

Why people bribe. What stops them. And what to do if you’re worried you’ve bribed someone. https://t.co/tYdE9rhoOz