News & what's on - Written by on Monday, August 20, 2012 15:03 - 0 Comments

Time to check the D&O cover. Moral hazard for prosecutors may create a two tier criminal defence system.

Print Friendly

Moral hazard is frequently talked about in the context of bailing out financial institutions during the ongoing economic crisis.

In a nice piece in the UK’s Lawyer Magazine Jo Rickards, a Corporate Crime and Internal investigations partner at DLA flags up recent UK changes affecting those who privately fund their defences which broadly speaking prevent them from recovering their costs if found not guilty.

The essence of the piece is that the changes are unfair.

Jo goes on to say that if the prosecutors are to get more aggressive then it is inappropriate to stack the cards in favour of the prosecutor in this way.

It is a pretty outrageous state of affairs that a prosecutor can bring a prosecution and, in the event of failure, have no responsibility to compensate for the costs of the defendant proving his/her/its innocence.

Sadly that will be the position.  But then again, the cards have been stacked in favour of prosecutors for some time.

Against a back drop of the draconian asset freezing ability of UK prosecutors under the restraint regime the ability of individual defendants to privately fund their defence was curtailed some time ago.

Life isn’t fair.

However there are a couple of things to bear in mind and one BIG question to ask if you are a Director or an Officer.

A tale of two corporations

Big corporations can easily out gun the resources of a prosecutor in terms of the money available to throw at the defence and they are often less concerned about recovery. For members of this club then – the cards are not as stacked against them as might appear at first blush.

The position is different for companies where cash is tight.  Let’s hope prosecutors do not cynically focus on weak targets…

Directors & Officers

Directors and officers (and their employers) should waste no more time and check their D&O cover or put some in place if they don’t have it.

If you want to know what to look for in your existing policy then read this piece we published earlier this year about everything you need to know about D&O cover.

 

 

Share Button


Comments are closed.

Brought to you by...

Barry Vitou &
Richard Kovalevsky Q.C.

The views expressed on this website are those of Barry Vitou & Richard Kovalevsky QC and/or our guest authors from time to time. Please see our terms of use

in association with...

Our Tweets

Sunday, June 11, 2017 8:18

Opinion: As debate shifts from future of SFO to future of Theresa May we say: At last, fund the SFO properly. https://t.co/PwuCqHPkTq

Friday, June 9, 2017 12:21

SFO cat uses up another life! SFO set to stay after Theresa May's authority is seriously undermined.

Tuesday, May 23, 2017 11:44

Opinion: Conservatives must answer two basic questions about the plan to merge the SFO into the NCA https://t.co/OREkjacH2H

Thursday, May 18, 2017 21:07

Announcement of SFO merger into the NCA must be followed with detailed plans and assurances to SFO plans now https://t.co/Sbq5zt9yWP

Friday, January 27, 2017 16:13

Why people bribe. What stops them. And what to do if you’re worried you’ve bribed someone. https://t.co/tYdE9rhoOz